A Sound of Thunder 2005
Directed by Peter Hyams · 101 mins · 2,065 views
Synopsis
Trailers
Reviews (122)
-
D
Mini Collab with fellow time jumper, Slay. I really do feel for Peter Hyams when it comes to the absolute nightmare of a production he had on A Sound of Thunder, a massively slashed budget, heavy flooding destroying sets and being forced to shoot everything on a greenscreen, ultimately stifling his creativity. What seemed like a good idea on paper goes woefully undeveloped and poorly realised. The film doesn’t exactly rewrite genre history; a catastrophe of bad acting, ludicrous science and horrifically shoddy special effects that can’t even follow its own internal logic from one scene to the next. Hyams’ usual excellent direction feels massively paired down. Still, occasional flashes of his usual quality almost break through the ugly CG…
33 -
C
I can’t believe that they had the balls to release this turd in theatres, especially after the hellish production it went through. First, filming was delayed due to severe floods that caused considerable damage to the set, as well as the original production company going bankrupt during post and there was not nearly enough money to finish the movie, resulting it to be shelved for several years. In that case, you think that they’d just cut their losses and fucking abandon it or maybe just finish it and quietly release it straight-to-video but nope, theatrical run, let’s serve up the fucking slop to the public. Some of the worst CGI & VFX I have ever seen in a film. Total top-to-bottom fucking garbage. I do recommend that you watch this though, just once, to see how filmmaking can go terribly wrong. 🚆💺⏰🌄🦖🔫🥾🦋⏱️🌊🐒🦎
180 -
S
A travesty and in the running for the worst movie I’ve watched for WHM.
24 -
S
“Last wave changes the last species to evolve, homo sapiens.” Homo Sapiens have been on earth for about 250k years, give or take a few millennia. At no point has evolution stopped on earth since we arrived.
36 -
B
I don’t know why I keep doing this to myself. This is the third time I’ve watched A Sound of Thunder in the last decade. I guess I just keep expecting it to be better than it really is. I mean, how can a movie with dinosaurs, mutant gorillas, man-eating plants and time-travel be this lame…? I don’t get it.
67 1 -
PPatrick Willems 8 月 22, 2026
If WB had tossed this away for a tax write-off I imagine everyone involved would’ve been glad
251 9 -
R
Uma das poucas histórias preocupadas com os mínimos detalhes de viagem no tempo. A produção é precária, há a presença de alguns rostos conhecidos e um roteiro que merece uma refilmagem urgente. O filme trabalha com o princípio de incerteza de Heisenberg, um dos pilares conceituais da física quântica. A grosso modo, é a impossibilidade de garantir a exatidão absoluta num ato que se repete inúmeras vezes. Interessante a correção do tempo através de ondas temporais.
112 -
A
Rewatched for WHM and dear lord… sometimes it’s best to NOT release such a troubled production. This whole thing is top-to-bottom embarrassing. It’s sub-SyFy channel shitty.
45 2 -
M
What I Wanted: A loose, but faithful and well meaning adaptation of the Ray Bradbury short story of the same name. What I Got: Shit on.
261 4 -
J
As a Peter Hyams evangelical I’d love to be able to reclaim this from its status as a notorious flop but the VFX here are just mind-bogglingly awful, an early experiment in doing pretty much all the action sequences of a film in arguably unfinished CGI, and it’s just impossible to see it as a true advancement over the old techniques (perhaps we fucked up and smashed a butterfly we weren’t supposed to somewhere back there?). Bradbury’s short story is one of those perfect objects that you can read once and then remember for the rest of your life, and a film version by Hyams is a good idea in theory, but this simply doesn’t work at all. Some cool creature designs though, I especially like the dino-baboons who kill David Oyelowo.
31 -
R
Action! – The Unlikely Rumble: Hill v Hyams As appears to be frequent with these directors of bygone eras who manage to make films into the new millennium, the quality tends to fade, and thus far the 2000’s have not been kind to our buddy Hyams, whose current work has seen his films being lambasted by critics, with his latest films sliding to the appalling 11 percent and below on Rotten Tomatoes. To be honest, this flick isn’t all that terrible. Indeed, the visual effects are largely awful, the cinematography has this cheapening quality that makes it appear nearly like something out of Syfy, and the plot is rather muddled. However, seeing it as a special (and bad) episode of,…
90 10 -
T
Surprisingly not the worst or most embarrassing thing Franchise Pictures produced. They produced Battlefield Earth. Gotta love how a movie about time travel and dinosaurs was more about mutated mandrills than anything else. The vfx had me crying. You can see the green screen behind them including the city scenes. $88 million. 88 million to have your dinosaur showpiece scene(shown multiple times) look like it was a cut scene from a 90s video game. Jurassic Park was 12 years earlier and made with $63 million. It made 1.9 million domestically at the box office and 11.6 worldwide. Director Peter Hyams second movie about time travel, 1994 Timecop staring Jean Claude van Damme. Hyams would go on to direct van Damme two more times, Sudden Death and Enemies Closer. Because on this account I make the atrociously bad time travel dinosaur movie all about Jean Claude van Damme.
41 -
BBacrau Santur ½ 8 月 9, 2026
This movie would be better if every character said “Listen to this!” and then they fart. And they do that for 101 minutes.
-
E
Magnificent in all his flaws. Xd CGI straight from PS3 🙂
-
B
Feels like watching a playthrough of a video game entirely composed of Quick Time Events, edited by someone listening to Trout Mask Replica on loop
-
G
This movie is good and not bad the CGI I Kinda Hate But Not Bad And I feel bad the the people who where making it That got banked rubbed? While Making This movie Surprised how I liked it
-
A
This was great fun, this is what low budget should be, shooting big,
-
B
La sinópsis suena súper interesante, pero la película falla en muchas cosas. Independientemente de los efectos especiales, el principal problema es la escritura poco profunda e infantil; además, hay un exceso de cosas innecesarias que no hacen mucha diferencia (como por ejemplo las hormigas gigantes, que sólo aparecen un minuto y nunca más). Es una película que además se siente muy lenta, y que simplemente quiso ser demasiado para su tiempo 💔
1 -
B
Evil capitalist overlords accidentally creating the monkey-saurus is very up my alley! So is idiot science about time waves and evolution. Edward Burns remains a poor man’s Ben Affleck, which makes him preferable to real Ben. But perhaps nothing is finer than Sir Ben Kingsley’s beautiful (and sometimes tall) white hair (and matching soul patch). It feels like I watched this movie every Sunday afternoon on SyFy twenty years ago. It was probably more like 5x over a year. But…
-
B
Me faltaron risas y dinosaurios No es culpa de la película, yo quería que fuera mucho más ridícula y divertida… sólo fue la primera. Tal vez di demasiadas dinoexpectativas. En general cumple con su función “película de ciencia ficción futurística protagonista guapo inteligente blender 2005”. Sólo estoy dinodolido 🦖💔 Pd. Mi IQ no comprende porque se llama El sonido del trueno… -Boss Minion fuera.
1 -
G
Ray Bradbury ha estado un pelín inquieto en su tumba al percibir como se usaba su relato para semejante despropósito. Pero solo un pelín, ojo, porque al final la historia y la vida se han cobrado las multas necesarias y su elenco protagonista (incluido el tupé de Kingsley) ya han desaparecido del panorama. Su director, otrora prometedor, no volvió a levantar cabeza. Y el imaginario colectivo nunca le dio ni el más mínimo hueco a esta peli. Poco en ella…
-
K
Was every scene green screen?
-
S
A great example of a great story that never needed to be adapted into a film- especially one with cheesy CGI & borrowed arcade style sound effects
-
L
Look, I’m all for films being in theaters, but probably not this abomination.
1 -
M
It feels like there’s another world where someone on the production of this film didn’t step on a butterfly and the CGI would’ve been good. Also why is it called a sound of thunder.
-
L
I’m glad they made those set pieces before they went bankrupt
-
M
-
J
Masterclass de malos efectos computarizados, mala actuación y guion sobrecargado. Si hay algo bueno para destacar… no se, la escena con bullet time me copó, aparte que los escenarios hechos de manera practica son muy buenos… el verdadero problema de toda esta mierda recae en como es adaptado este cuento a la gran pantalla. A Sound of Thunder, de Ray Bradbury, es un cuento estupidamente corto y que va al grano con su premicia del viaje en el tiempo y…
-
C
-
A
Given the troubled production, you’d ideally want to approach this with some emotional generosity and not place too much emphasis on the abysmal VFX – placeholder renders of creatures that visibly hover above the ground they’re supposed to be walking on, backgrounds that look like SimCity 2000 opening cinematics, Windows Movie Maker earthquake and distortion effects, sub-Channel Awesome greenscreen work – but then the script makes matters even worse by dropping lines about homo sapiens being “the last species to evolve,” acting…
2 -
E
1.8/10. Mount Rushmore of Best Worst Movies Ever Made. It’s peak.
-
G
ideia legal, execução péssima. Top filmes para ver com o celular na mão.
-
J
Unfortunately, I loved this stinker.
-
R
A fun little “What if” flick! The CGI is pretty bad, however. The acting leaves a bit to be desired, but I did have fun with it.
-
E
Dated. Bad effects. But interesting
-
A
En toute honneteté il s’agit la d’un film avec un concept excellent rempli de bonnes idees avec une ecriture qui se tient et s’assume totalement en allant jusqu’au bout des choses. Oui le CGI est particulierement affreuse a regarder faisant perdre des points a ce film mais son idee et son concept sauve tout. C’est franchement une oeuvre qui meriterait un remake avec la technologie d’aujourd’hui.
1 -
S
Legitimately horrible, but in an oddly charming sort-of clueless way. Like when you see an action figure at a Dollar Tree that’s called the Indelible Bulk or Echolocation-Themed Hero. As a wee lad, my first exposure to this was when my family went to go see The Work and the Glory, which is an LDS movie. It was huge coup to see such a niche movie in our local movie theater, so our entire congregation was there for the premiere.…
-
J
How was this allowed to be released in theaters? And the same year as Peter Jackson’s “King Kong” and “Revenge of the Sith”? Ben Kingsley’s hair….
10 -
A
This is a tough one because the story is just so good – the book is great – but the movie is so poorly put together with what looks like a super low budget. I mean really, super bad effects and comically bad CGI and green screen scenes. But I LOVE Ray Bradbury stories – they are some of my favorite reads, and the movie does at least tell the story so gets this fairly favorable rating based on that.
1 -
R
Cool concept since it was based on a Ray Bradbury story that alone makes it worth watching but man does this movie look awful. Apparently the production company went bankrupt half way through making it and you can definitely tell. Green screen that’s YouTube shorts quality and ps2 graphics quality cgi. It’s frustrating such a cool concept was wasted on such a poorly cobbled together movie. I can’t believe it was given a theatrical release and not buried as a…
-
T
I was hoping it would be Bad good, with monsters and Dinosaurs set in the future. But no. It was just garbage.
-
X
J’étais étonné de ne jamais avoir entendu parler de ce film alors que y’a des dinosaures dedans. Maintenant je comprends pourquoi, c’est une catastrophe à tous les étages, son développement à été un enfer et il n’a récolté que 11M de dollars pour un budget de 80M. Les effets spéciaux sont abominables vu le budget et la date de sortie, les acteurs sont navrants, les dialogues sont en carton, y’a pas de mise en scène, le scénario est un bordel…
-
J
How Did This Get Made?
-
T
This is really terrible wow.
-
Ssrac126 7 月 4, 2026
Had to watch this in class and the only way to describe it is horrendous. It has a good meaning but it should’ve been kept as a short story
-
JJamie 7 月 3, 2026
lol this sucked
-
H
в детстві дуже боялась помню з татом дивились по тв мама була на корпоративі як я цих макак сука боялась пів жизни но передивилась год назад така ржака
3 -
S
-
C
ooooft
-
O
Short story went too long
-
M
Defeitos especiais. Incrível como a novela Os Mutantes da Record entregou muito mais.
-
R
pretty bad but you can feel it’s earnestness and I have to respect it for that. unsurprisingly, I did not fw the shoddy cgi ape lizards. adding them to the list of things that would have shit me up if I’d seen them as a kid.
2 -
Aalex 6 月 20, 2026
god i forgot how bad this movie is😭😭 the greenscreen, the cgi, the ridiculous stunts… so funny
-
D
There’s a lot wrong with this, and even though you can’t really help the studio basically going bust before they completed post-production, A Sound of Thunder is still awful. The budget problems means the effects look cheap and very nasty, but even looking past that, the rest of the movie is a bit of a mess beyond salvaging. At least a very Bob Barker looking Ben Kingsley seemed to be having fun.
-
C
This movie is so bad it makes me wanna go back in time and kill the first fish that dared step their stinky paw in land.
1 -
K
Ed Burns is improbably irresistible to all women in this shitty adaptation of a short story which shamelessly borrows from Aliens and Jurassic Park. The only original thought here went into Ben Kingsley’s hair piece.
-
T
I caught this on the scifi channel as a kid but didn’t get to see the end and it became completely lost to me after that. I remembered it as “that weird scifi channel dinosair time travel movie I could never find again and dammit no not Days of Thunder the one I want doesn’t have Tom Cruise” for the longest time. Then recently I rediscovered it fully and learned that it’s based on a Ray Bradbury (my favorite author)…
-
C
This beautiful disaster must be seen to believe. A time traveling tourism company screws up the timeline and our heroes must act fast to repair it while the world crumbles around them. There is a great story there. The actors deliver, especially Ben Kingsley as the sleazy owner of the company. It seems that a real disaster struck the set and forced them to film everything with green screens and that’s not even the worst part. The CGI backgrounds and…
-
M
Obnoxious unempathetic monsters living in Gold Coast and Streeterville mansions? I thought this was supposed to be fiction! [the bad cgi and silly plot really grew on me tho]
-
D
Difficult to rate, it’s literally an unfinished movie. They basically released a workprint to theatres. No exaggeration, there are scenes that look like they were plucked straight of The Amazing Bulk. Renny Harlin, the original director—quit. Pierce Brosnan, the original star—quit. Franchise Pictures, its biggest piggy bank—litigated for fraud and bankrupted during post-production. Little money remained for VFX or virtually any post-production at all. Kind of a fun oddity to revisit with all that in mind, but the average person sitting in…
-
P
Péssimos efeitos visuais kkkkk o roteiro se perde várias vezes, mas eu e meu marido nos divertimos e isso que vale.
-
T
-
K
“A single mistake in the past, by a time travel company in the future, has devastating and unforeseen consequences.” -IMDb This was an interesting watch and I’m unsure how best to describe it. Think of the most banged up, rusted car you’ve ever seen, it looks bad, makes worrying noises, the seats are damp and uncomfortable, you don’t know what that smell is coming from the boot and honestly you don’t want to know and there’s a family of aggressive…
1 -
Z
-
A
У этого фильма бюджет почти как у 2 эпизода звездных войн. При этом, ЗВ имеют на час больше хронометража. Перед нами фильм, в котором попилили бабло. Ни графики, ни актеров, никого именитого даже в сьемочной группе. Вопрос, куда ушли деньги? Этот фильм выглядит на 20млн, но никак не на заявленные 80млн.
-
S
This shit is so ass 💔
-
F
Une honte de sortir ça avec un tel budget
-
S
Good to see Sir Ben Kingsley hamming it up. David Oyelowo! ~~ You can mock the special effects, but the script would still be stinky poopoo regardless of how good the ape-bat-reptiles looked. Such a cool premise; such a shame.
-
P
Bradbury should be adapted for the cars universe
-
R
-
P
Kingsley single ‘HA’ was the best part of this film.
-
J
Cool concept, prehistoric execution. Based on Ray Bradbury’s 1952 short story of the same name, this 101-minute sci-fi thriller from director Peter Hyams was a massive box office disappointment following its September 2005 release. The 111-minute narrative follows scientist Edward Burns as the lead guide and researcher for a temporal tourism agency, who must save the world after a single mistake during a prehistoric safari has devastating and unforeseen consequences in present-day Chicago. Burnsy is definitely doing his best in…
5 -
N
saw this at a local venue for Time Travel Tuesday with lots of other people, all of us chatting and joking along with the movie. genuinely such a fun time! I was laughing and smiling and giddy! can’t believe the green screen city predated Speed Racer by 3 years. a masterwork. it’s just dumb fun!!! wish I had more creatures and more sense but also kinda who cares that it doesn’t!!!!
3 -
N
4ª o 5ª vez que la veo desde que soy niña, y 1ª desde que tengo Letterbox. Asique se viene reseña: Cada vez que la veo peor hecha me parece, pero la sigo disfrutando casi como cuando era niña. Qué le voy a hacer, soy totalmente el target de ésta clase de películas 😆 Pese a la ejecución tiene ideas muy buenas que me hacen siempre pensar lo bien que podría haber salido… Y el cómo funciona el tiempo en la película me parece bastante acertado.
-
𖤐
li o livro e fiquei na pilha de assistir o filme. tem um bom cgi pros nos 90… -ah mas o filme é de 2005 -exatamente.
-
N
The plot of this movie always stuck with me when i was a kid, i only remembered really liking it so im giving it this rating bc im blinded by nostalgia.
-
JJess_vanhaeften 5 月 12, 2026
Suspense Thriller based on the famous short story by master of fiction Ray Bradbury. In the year 2055, a technology has been invented that enables people to go back in time to hunt dinosaurs. When one such expedition to the Prehistoric past unwittingly makes a fatal mistake it dramatically impacts the course of evolution, setting off waves of destruction that ripple toward the modern world and unleashing an army of fearsome creatures that never should have existed. Two scientists race against time to fix the catastrophic error while their world collapses around them and every minute brings the human race closer to extinction.
-
F
I wish Hyams had gotten the full $80 million budget he was promised to finish the film he wanted, but alas, this is what we have. And it’s not half-bad either. Mostly the half-finished VFX is what drags this down but it doesn’t totally take out of what’s happening in the film. It’s just a little disappointing that Hyams signature lighting is almost non-existent except for maybe one or two scenes. Ben Kingsley has the stand out performance here, he…
-
J
80 million dollar shit fi channel movie. Production wise this is on par with Jack Frost 2 and somehow cost like ten million more (adjusted to inflation) than 2001 A Space Odyssey. Watched this because I played the GBA game, not knowing it was based on a movie. Wish I never would’ve knew. Can they go back in time to stop me from emulating it in the first place? Game was like a 5/10 anyway.
5 -
L
-
M
C’est regrettable que l’une des meilleures nouvelles de Ray Bradbury, avec un si fort potentiel, n’ai connu qu’une adaptation en téléfilm pour lequel le mot “médiocre” est, tout compte fait, charitable.
-
A
„Haben wir irgendetwas verändert?“ Es ist fast schon jämmerlich, wie man aus der brillanten Prämisse des Schmetterlingseffekts einen derart belanglosen Unsinn fabrizieren kann. Wer auch immer diese visuellen Effekte abgenickt hat, sollte lebenslanges Berufsverbot erhalten. Tatsächlich scheint der Film genau das bewirkt zu haben: Er markierte für fast alle Beteiligten das unrühmliche Ende ihrer Karriere. Das tat wirklich weh beim zusehen.
3 -
A
Perhaps I am blinded by nostalgia but I really do not see why this is so lowly rated? A 2.0 is super low for letterboxd; that’s sub Bigfoot Family by a wide margin. I get the CGI looks rough in some places but honestly for the time period and the fact the production company went under, on average they do not look too bad to me? Some scenes with the cars are for sure terrible but the creatures look pretty…
1 2 -
P
парк юрского периода тока неинтересный
-
A
scared me in gr.6
-
P
Some really great sets, shame what they wound up putting on them. There’s no way to actually expect this to be scientifically accurate but it is kinda wild that evolution/devolution in this movie works like it does in Digimon.
-
H
Watched with headphones on; i thought it was super fun and wish it was a full gear ride at universal.
-
H
Happened accidental Time travelling day in movies. There are some really nice ideas. The world being so destroyed you can see lions only as holograms, or time travel dinosaur hunt being a rich people’s entertainment. And all these monster designs like monster baboons, water beasts, giant bats. But the movie feels so undeveloped with really cliche ways and overexplaining the thing going on… It was still a fun watch, but it’s one of those movies which deserve a remake that would make it all look better.
1 -
R
Wut?
-
T
Baffling. Also, Ben Kingsley doing some of his best work.
-
L
это че ваще
-
M
From our “Terrible Movies” series, this is (very loosely) based on a Ray Bradbury short story about time travel. Ed Burns, a good supporting actor in much better movies, seems to have been hired here as sort of a poor men’s Ben Affleck, and he makes Affleck look like a master of portraying emotions. He plays the leader of “safaris” of rich people who go back in time to hunt dinosaurs (who would have died seconds later anyway, so time…
-
Z
Ik weet niet wat ik enger vind: de plastic dinosaurus, de schrikbarend amateuristische groene schermen, het afgeraffelde en met plotgaten gevulde verhaal, Sonia Rands “evolutie” naar een groot grijs monster of het doodse spel van Edward Burns. Ik kies ze allemaal.
-
M
Podre.
-
M
Filme b bem legal sobre viagem no tempo, a ação se desenrola, diverte bem
-
E
-
C
Peter Hyams, noooooo!!!
-
T
O Thiago criança, que assistiu no SBT, daria 5 estrelas. Mas na época eu não tinha, na época, o córtex préfrontal desenvolvido…
-
F
Değeri bilinmeyen filmlerden
-
R
Watchable but definitely not a great one
-
G
A criatividade humana elevada a décima potencia, falando sobre o efeito borboleta pasmem com a morte de uma, que uma onda temporal deve ser literalmente uma onda, e que tudo pode ser resolvido obviamente voltando no tempo. Furos que eu vi no filme, como eles voltam sempre o mesmo momento todo dia, e não encontram sua versão do passado que estaria fazendo a mesma ação? Sendo que é assim que funciona no último ato, pq a morte da borboleta apenas…
-
J
I’m gonna say this and say this once this movie was straight ass I’m so sorry and to think that the director of this movie wasted a talent like Academy Award Winner Ben Kingsley in this movie is crazy af. The visual effects and the cgi were laughably bad, the acting was poor and the pacing was all over the place. I gotta say this movie unintentionally made me laugh my ass off.
1 2 -
M
Incomprehensible.
-
J
When he walks in the apartment with the bag of fertilizer slung over his shoulder with his hands down by his side I almost lost it Horrendous movie
1 -
P
Efectos de Playstation 1 y una historia de ciencia ficción que involucra a dinosaurios y avariciosos. Si fuera un juego de steam me agradaría, pero bue.
-
T
O que falar de um filme que se propõe a viajar no tempo para realizar um safari, a ideia é muito ridícula e por isso mesmo é bem crível que de fato isso fosse ser uma ideia verdadeira na realidade. Apesar da ideia, o filme executa da maneira mais genérica possível, é legal quando extrapolam a cadeia evolutiva e acabam tendo que enfrentar babuínossauros, mas o filme inteiro é bem óbvio desde o começo. Enfim, um filme já feito.
-
D
Absolutely nothing could have prepared me for the baboonosaurus. I remember watching this in a THX-certified (now Dolby Atmos) cinema hall. May God have mercy on my soul.
-
B
Bulletproof baboons
-
J
This is a first draft. This film is still being developed and thus should not be viewed by an audience. That’s the only explanation for the editing that does not occur and the effects that are clearly placeholder for something much more spectacular and believable in this movie. I also love that the poster/promo art for the film make it seem like a creepy psychological horror movie and not a time-traveling, bafflingly convoluted mess like it is. The fact that…
-
J
Those baboon lizard bat guys look just like my ex girlfriend. 🦋
-
S
dios que es esto??!!
-
S
The futuristic green screen scenes remind me of a 30 Rock cutaway bit that never was. It’s bad but I’ve watched worse that looked better.
-
A
For HDTGM. I really can’t fathom how this film cost $80M in 2005 money. None of the effects —and I mean truly none—look good. It’s incredible that it was released at all, but I heard on the podcast that they had a clause that forced them to release the film. I was sad to read that Peter Hyams spent three years working on editing this film together. There was really nothing that could be done to fix the botched visuals…
-
N
Velocipastor could never.
-
A
The butterfly effect, but dumber and worse in every possible way.
-
V
they said big budget i said bitch where under all that cgi i said bitch where
-
S
Making movies is hard. Sometimes you wake up with shit in your bed.
-
S
Papo reto, um dos filmes mais feios que ja vi em questão de efeito pqp Mas assim, a premissa e a mensagem são interessantes
-
K
i kinda love this movie…it’s never been more over…
-
K
It was alright. Was mostly watching it for Ed Burns.
-
P
Muito bom de verdade!
-
I
динозавров пиздить можно, бабочек – нет.
- Synopsis
- When a hunter sent back to the prehistoric era runs off the path he must not leave, he causes a chain reaction that alters history in disastrous ways.
- Director
- Peter Hyams
- Writer
- Joshua Oppenheimer, Thomas Dean Donnelly, Gregory Poirier
- Studio
- Franchise Pictures, Crusader Entertainment, ApolloMedia, Baldwin Entertainment Group
- Country
- Czechia, Germany, Switzerland, UK
- Language
- English, Chinese
- Year
- 2005
- Runtime
- 101 mins
- France15 May 2005
- Spain26 Aug 2005
- Netherlands01 Sep 2005
- USA02 Sep 2005
- Philippines14 Sep 2005
- Singapore15 Sep 2005
- Belgium12 Oct 2005
- Portugal03 Nov 2005
- Czechia24 Nov 2005
- Iceland25 Nov 2005
- South Africa23 Dec 2005
- UK01 Mar 2006
- Japan25 Mar 2006
- Israel27 Jul 2006
- Mexico06 Oct 2006
- Egypt25 Apr 2007
- Panama10 Aug 2007
- Kuwait06 Sep 2007
- South Korea28 Jul 2011
- Germany17 Feb 2013
- Switzerland15 May 2005
- UK04 Sep 2006
- France08 Dec 2006
Write a Review